Patient care navigation and health copilot AI

Your Healthcare Agent

Your Healthcare Agent’s historical profile describes patient-authored instructions for delegated assistance. Current project verification was unsuccessful. The historical 86 remains provisional, with platform conditions and collaborator disclosures preserved.

Current verification incomplete Read full report Open directory

Current verification incomplete. The September 8 assessment records access limitations. The earlier 2026-06-22 evidence has not been freshly confirmed.

86 /100 toward patient-directed

Agency posture Strongly agency-expanding, with platform and verification caveats

The question we ask Who does Your Healthcare Agent serve in this deployment?

Control Historically a copyable Claude navigation specification. Project instructions and host-platform behavior are separate assessment layers.

Agency read Strongly agency-expanding, with platform and verification caveats

Vendor: Nick Dawson / independent open-source project
Who it serves: Patient-directed, source-available healthcare navigation agent spec
Primary User: Patients, caregivers, benefits navigators, community health workers, and organizations helping people navigate coverage, billing, denials, records, appointments, and prescriptions
Control Model: Vendor-hosted public service. Controls and downstream processors depend on the assessed deployment.
Patient Impact: Historical guidance connects documents, rights and verification to concrete challenges and drafts. No fresh project or outcome evidence was recovered.
Profile Status: Current verification incomplete
Last assessed: Sep 8, 2026
Review Confidence: Low for current project, moderate for historical design (AI-assisted draft)
AI / Model: OpenAI Codex / GPT-6
Human Review: Hugo Campos authorized publication of these AI-assisted draft reassessments on September 8, 2026. This does not claim comprehensive human verification of every finding.

Summary judgment · 86 out of 100 toward patient-directed

Historically a copyable Claude navigation specification. Project instructions and host-platform behavior are separate assessment layers.

Strongly agency-expanding, with platform and verification caveats

Patient agency

How this tool changes agency

Expands agency when

Historical guidance connects documents, rights and verification to concrete challenges and drafts. No fresh project or outcome evidence was recovered.

Limits agency when

Current setup, specification, action approvals and accessibility remain unverified

Patient agency assessment

Who sets and changes the goal?

Patient authority

The historical editable specification gives users meaningful direction over administrative assistance. It cannot ensure the host model follows every instruction or obtains approval for every consequential action.

What can the patient understand, question, or do?

Critical capacity

Historical guidance connects documents, rights and verification to concrete challenges and drafts. No fresh project or outcome evidence was recovered.

Can the patient evaluate the conditions of use?

Informed control

The platform's privacy conditions remain material. Preserve the collaborator disclosure and distinguish a publicly inspectable prompt from an independently verified service.

Text findings

Conflict of interest

Related to an already disclosed HugoScore collaborator

The project was designed and built by Nick Dawson, whose OwnChart project is already profiled by HugoScore with a maintainer conflict-of-interest disclosure. Your Healthcare Agent also explicitly cites CAIHL and HugoScore. This profile should be read as a draft and would benefit from third-party review.

Conditions of use

Published controls and their limits

The platform's privacy conditions remain material. Preserve the collaborator disclosure and distinguish a publicly inspectable prompt from an independently verified service.

What remains unknown?

Not tested or not established

Current setup, specification, action approvals and accessibility remain unverified

Who evaluated this?

AI-assisted public-source draft

Vendor statements describe published conditions, not independently verified behavior. No clinical, security, accessibility, or legal validation is claimed. Earlier evidence remains dated in the report and history.

Sources checked

Source-specific findings and retrieval limitations are recorded in the full report.

Review provenance

Criteria

CAIHL-derived HugoScore framework and September 7 qualitative review priorities. Draft v1.2 numerical anchors remain unadopted.

Reviewer

AI-assisted public-source reassessment prepared in OpenAI Codex.

AI / model

OpenAI Codex / GPT-6

Human review

Hugo Campos authorized publication of these AI-assisted draft reassessments on September 8, 2026. This does not claim comprehensive human verification of every finding.

Review date

2026-09-08

Limitations

Current setup, specification, action approvals and accessibility remain unverified No live product use, patient-data upload, account creation, code audit, clinical evaluation, or independent implementation validation.

Review method

Focused public-source reassessment using CAIHL: patient authority, critical capacity, and informed control. Existing evidence plus one focused primary-source pass and at most one targeted follow-up. No live product testing. Numerical scores remain provisional editorial placements, not a new calculation.

Current verification incomplete · Low for current project, moderate for historical design (AI-assisted draft)