Your Healthcare Agent CAIHL draft report

Your Healthcare Agent: CAIHL reassessment

September 8, 2026. Published AI-assisted draft.

Your Healthcare Agent’s historical profile describes patient-authored instructions for delegated assistance. Current project verification was unsuccessful. The historical 86 remains provisional, with platform conditions and collaborator disclosures preserved.

Scope and agency posture

Historically a copyable Claude navigation specification. Project instructions and host-platform behavior are separate assessment layers.

Posture: Strongly agency-expanding, with platform and verification caveats.

Axis: 86/100, retained provisionally. No numerical recalibration was performed.

Sources and documented findings

• The frozen June report documents editable, rights-aware instructions and verification-oriented appeal and record workflows, plus Nick Dawson's disclosed relationship to HugoScore. These remain historical findings.

• The focused raw spec and setup-page fetches failed. The one targeted repository README fallback also failed, so current project instructions were not verified. https://www.yourhealthcareagent.org/agent-spec.md and https://www.yourhealthcareagent.org/start/ and https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nickpdawson/yourhealthcareagent/main/README.md

• Anthropic's current privacy policy permits consumer input/output training unless users opt out, with specified safety and feedback exceptions. The instruction site's openness does not govern this processing. https://www.anthropic.com/legal/privacy

Patient authority

Inference from the documented workflow: The historical editable specification gives users meaningful direction over administrative assistance. It cannot ensure the host model follows every instruction or obtains approval for every consequential action.

Critical capacity

Editorial assessment: Historical guidance connects documents, rights and verification to concrete challenges and drafts. No fresh project or outcome evidence was recovered.

Informed control

Editorial assessment: The platform's privacy conditions remain material. Preserve the collaborator disclosure and distinguish a publicly inspectable prompt from an independently verified service.

Assessment and limits

The design basis for 86 is specific but not freshly confirmed. An unclear current verification disposition is appropriate without reducing a score because pages failed.

Confidence: Low for current project, moderate for historical design.

Remaining uncertainty: Current setup, specification, action approvals and accessibility remain unverified

Published documentation is evidence of stated conditions, not proof of actual implementation. Unknowns did not receive automatic negative points. Funding, sponsorship, and public code do not determine agency by themselves.

Review provenance

• Reviewer/model: OpenAI Codex / GPT-6.
• Method: Focused public-source reassessment using CAIHL: patient authority, critical capacity, and informed control. Existing evidence plus one focused primary-source pass and at most one targeted follow-up. No live product testing. Numerical scores remain provisional editorial placements, not a new calculation.
• Human review: Hugo Campos authorized publication of these AI-assisted draft reassessments on September 8, 2026. This does not claim comprehensive human verification of every finding.
• Earlier review: 2026-06-22. Historical assessment. Earlier claims are not automatically reverified by this publication.

Disclosures

Related to an already disclosed HugoScore collaborator. The project was designed and built by Nick Dawson, whose OwnChart project is already profiled by HugoScore with a maintainer conflict-of-interest disclosure. Your Healthcare Agent also explicitly cites CAIHL and HugoScore. This profile should be read as a draft and would benefit from third-party review.