# Carey: CAIHL reassessment

September 8, 2026. Published AI-assisted draft.

Carey describes user-requested calls, scheduling, refill coordination, and human assistance. Delegated help can support a patient’s chosen task. Task approval, mid-task revocation, caregiver authority, and current legal terms remain incompletely verified.

## Scope and agency posture

Family-facing administrative concierge with AI and human assistance. Patient authority must be distinguished from a caregiver's authority to act.

Posture: **Potentially agency-expanding**.

Axis: 76/100, retained provisionally. No numerical recalibration was performed.

## Sources and documented findings

- The current homepage describes user-requested calls, scheduling, refill coordination, status updates and human oversight when needed. It continues to display HIPAA Certified & Compliant wording. https://www.hicarey.com/

- The privacy page and one targeted terms-page fallback rendered no substantive legal text. The June review's RESET deletion, anonymized training and HIPAA-status statements remain historically sourced rather than freshly confirmed. https://www.hicarey.com/privacy and https://www.hicarey.com/terms

## Patient authority

Inference from the documented workflow: The described workflow begins with the user's task. Completion of calls can expand practical authority, but the pages do not establish approval boundaries, revocation mid-task or safeguards when family and patient wishes differ.

## Critical capacity

Editorial assessment: Status visibility supports coordination. It does not by itself establish an inspectable call record or a way to challenge an incorrect action.

## Informed control

Editorial assessment: Current marketing confirms AI and human involvement. The historical legal-versus-marketing tension remains unresolved because current terms did not render, not because bad practice was demonstrated.

## Assessment and limits

The qualified positive posture remains plausible for delegated administrative action. Keep its low-to-medium confidence and historical evidence dates. Do not treat a certification label as evidence of patient control.

Confidence: Low to moderate.

Remaining uncertainty: Task-level authorization, human access, revocation and current legal terms remain unresolved

Published documentation is evidence of stated conditions, not proof of actual implementation. Unknowns did not receive automatic negative points. Funding, sponsorship, and public code do not determine agency by themselves.

## Review provenance

- Reviewer/model: OpenAI Codex / GPT-6.
- Method: Focused public-source reassessment using CAIHL: patient authority, critical capacity, and informed control. Existing evidence plus one focused primary-source pass and at most one targeted follow-up. No live product testing. Numerical scores remain provisional editorial placements, not a new calculation.
- Human review: Hugo Campos authorized publication of these AI-assisted draft reassessments on September 8, 2026. This does not claim comprehensive human verification of every finding.
- Earlier review: 2026-06-12. [Historical assessment](https://github.com/hugooc/HugoScore/blob/7e0ba68fae543832fe5f19009448e473983f48a9/site/reports/hicarey-caihl-report.md). Earlier claims are not automatically reverified by this publication.